🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 is remembered as arguably the deadliest – and significant – days during thirty years of unrest in this area.

In the streets where it happened – the memories of Bloody Sunday are visible on the structures and seared in people's minds.

A civil rights march was held on a cold but bright day in the city.

The protest was challenging the practice of imprisonment without charges – holding suspects without due process – which had been established in response to three years of conflict.

Troops from the specialized division fatally wounded 13 people in the neighborhood – which was, and still is, a predominantly nationalist population.

A particular photograph became especially prominent.

Images showed a clergyman, Father Daly, using a stained with blood cloth in his effort to shield a assembly carrying a young man, the injured teenager, who had been mortally injured.

Journalists recorded much footage on the day.

Historical records contains Father Daly telling a journalist that soldiers "just seemed to shoot indiscriminately" and he was "totally convinced" that there was no provocation for the shooting.

That version of what happened wasn't accepted by the original examination.

The first investigation determined the military had been fired upon initially.

Throughout the negotiation period, the administration established a new investigation, in response to advocacy by bereaved relatives, who said Widgery had been a whitewash.

That year, the findings by the inquiry said that on balance, the soldiers had discharged weapons initially and that zero among the casualties had presented danger.

The contemporary government leader, the leader, apologised in the House of Commons – stating killings were "unjustified and unjustifiable."

Law enforcement commenced look into the incident.

An ex-soldier, identified as the accused, was brought to trial for killing.

Accusations were made over the killings of the first individual, 22, and 26-year-old William McKinney.

The accused was also accused of seeking to harm several people, other civilians, more people, Michael Quinn, and an unknown person.

There is a legal order maintaining the defendant's privacy, which his legal team have argued is essential because he is at danger.

He told the investigation that he had exclusively discharged his weapon at people who were armed.

This assertion was disputed in the final report.

Material from the examination would not be used directly as proof in the criminal process.

During the trial, the accused was shielded from sight using a blue curtain.

He addressed the court for the first time in the proceedings at a session in late 2024, to answer "not responsible" when the charges were presented.

Kin of those who were killed on that day made the trip from Derry to Belfast Crown Court every day of the case.

John Kelly, whose sibling was fatally wounded, said they were aware that hearing the case would be emotional.

"I remember everything in my mind's eye," the relative said, as we visited the key areas discussed in the case – from Rossville Street, where Michael was fatally wounded, to the adjacent the area, where one victim and the second person were died.

"It returns me to where I was that day.

"I participated in moving my brother and place him in the medical transport.

"I went through every moment during the proceedings.

"But even with having to go through all that – it's still worthwhile for me."